Blog

10BASE-T1S vs CAN: Top 10 Insights

December 12, 2025

When engineers explore modern communication systems, one of the most important comparisons they make is 10BASE-T1S vs CAN.

Both technologies power automotive, industrial, and embedded systems, but they work in very different ways. While CAN has been the dominant low-cost serial bus for decades, 10BASE-T1S is a newer Ethernet-based option promising higher speed, scalability, and seamless IP-based networking across entire machines or vehicles.

This article breaks down everything you need to know—technical specs, use cases, performance, benefits, challenges, and the future outlook. Whether you’re an engineer, a product designer, or someone exploring industrial networking, this comparison will give you a crystal-clear understanding.

What Is 10BASE-T1S?

Get info here

10BASE-T1S vs CAN: Technical Comparison Table

Feature 10BASE-T1S CAN Bus
Speed 10 Mbps 1 Mbps (Classical), 8 Mbps (CAN FD)
Medium Single twisted pair Twisted pair
Topology Multi-drop Ethernet Multi-drop
Protocol Ethernet (Layer 2) Message-based
Max nodes 8–16 typical Up to 30+
Distance 25 m 40–1000 m (depending on speed)
Real-time capability High with PLCA High with arbitration
Cost Higher Very low
Integration Native IP networking Requires gateway
EMI immunity High Very high

Performance Differences in Real-World Applications

Automotive Networking Use Cases

Modern vehicles now pack 70–150+ electronic control units (ECUs). CAN has been the standard for body electronics, powertrain communication, and diagnostics. However, as vehicles become more digital—especially with ADAS, EV power systems, and zonal architectures—CAN’s limitations become clear.

Where 10BASE-T1S Wins in Automotive:

  • Faster throughput for sensor fusion
  • IP-based communication for OTA updates
  • Support for zonal architecture with fewer gateways
  • Reduced wiring weight
  • Ethernet backbone compatibility

Where CAN Still Dominates:

  • Body electronics (locks, HVAC, windows)
  • Low-speed control loops
  • Safety-critical subsystems needing simplicity

Because 10BASE-T1S supports multi-drop Ethernet, it blends the simplicity of CAN with the speed of Ethernet, making it a strong competitor.

Industrial Systems Use Cases

In factories, automation systems rely heavily on CAN, CANopen, DeviceNet, and other low-level protocols. However, the shift toward Industry 4.0 and IP-centric networks is pushing interest in 10BASE-T1S.

Why Industries Adopt 10BASE-T1S:

  • Increased bandwidth for sensors
  • Seamless integration into Ethernet-based SCADA
  • Better compatibility with cloud-connected systems
  • Deterministic communication via PLCA

Why CAN Remains Strong in Industrial Automation:

  • Extremely mature ecosystem
  • Cheap modules and transceivers
  • Robust physical layer in noisy environments
  • Perfect for small, real-time control loops

In short, 10BASE-T1S supports future scalability, while CAN remains unbeatable for low-cost legacy setups.

Why 10BASE-T1S Is Considered the Future of Low-Speed Ethernet

  • Supports full IP networking even at low speeds
  • Reduces gateways and protocol converters
  • Lowers wiring cost and weight
  • Provides deterministic performance
  • Offers higher bandwidth than CAN
  • Simplifies sensor fusion in automotive and robotics

It enables a world where even tiny sensors can speak native Ethernet, removing translation layers and speeding up system-level communication.

Strengths of CAN That Still Make It Relevant

  • Ultra-cheap
  • Ultra-robust
  • Easy to implement
  • Perfect for low-speed control loops
  • Supported by a massive ecosystem
  • Reliable in harsh electrical environments

CAN FD also boosts capacity significantly, giving older systems a performance upgrade without switching protocols.

Cost, Complexity, and Integration Comparison

Hardware cost Higher Very low
Wiring Simple single pair Simple twisted pair
Software complexity Higher (Ethernet stack) Lower
Integration with cloud Easy Requires gateway
Learning curve Moderate Very low
Debug tools Ethernet-standard CAN-specific

The biggest drawback of 10BASE-T1S today is cost. However, as adoption grows—especially in automotive—the price gap is shrinking quickly.

FAQs About 10BASE-T1S vs CAN

  1. Is 10BASE-T1S faster than CAN?
    Yes. 10BASE-T1S offers 10 Mbps, while CAN tops out at 1 Mbps (or 8 Mbps for CAN FD).
  2. Can 10BASE-T1S replace CAN?
    It can replace CAN in some applications, especially where higher bandwidth or IP networking is needed, but CAN remains ideal for simple, low-cost tasks.
  3. Does 10BASE-T1S support multi-drop like CAN?
    Yes. That’s one of its biggest strengths—it enables multi-drop Ethernet.
  4. Is CAN cheaper than 10BASE-T1S?
    Absolutely. CAN is still significantly lower in cost.
  5. Which is better for automotive electronics?
    10BASE-T1S is better for modern zonal architectures; CAN is still widely used for body and comfort electronics.
  6. Where can I learn more about the 802.3cg standard?
    You can review IEEE documentation or visit the official Ethernet Alliance website:
    https://ethernetalliance.org

Conclusion

The debate of 10BASE-T1S vs CAN isn’t about which is universally better—it’s about choosing the right tool for the right job. 10BASE-T1S brings Ethernet-level scalability, higher speeds, and IP connectivity, making it perfect for modern systems. Meanwhile, CAN remains unmatched in simplicity, affordability, and reliability.

Most future vehicles and industrial machines will likely use both, combining CAN’s reliability with 10BASE-T1S’s high-bandwidth Ethernet capability.